Posts Tagged ‘james levine’

The Return of Charles Dutoit?

Friday, February 1st, 2019

By: Frank Cadenhead

The monumental work of Hector Berlioz, La Damnation de Faust, programmed Sunday at the Paris Philharmonie, has a famed conductor on the podium: Charles Dutoit. The music world has noticed.

It is a highlight of the Orchestre National de France’s celebration of the 150th anniversary of Berlioz’ death and was to have been conducted by music director Emmanuel Krivine. Illness forced him to cancel only in the last few days and the orchestra was left with a major problem. Four major soloists and both the youth and regular orchestra choirs were already assembled and few conductors have this work in their repertory and are available on such short notice. Dutoit, of course, is a well-known champion of Berlioz and recently has plenty of free time.

One of the principal examples of conductors who routinely harassed women, his world-wide career was abruptly terminated in recent months by new forces including the #metoo movement. Most assume that it has put a definitive end to the careers of famed conductors and other leaders who have, often for decades, used their position to behave badly. But has it? Daniele Gatti has recently given notice that he will legally contest his abrupt dismissal as music director of the Concertgebouw Orchestra of Amsterdam and the Rome Opera took him on board as music director in December. Dutoit has been named Principal Guest Conductor for the St. Petersburg Philharmonic Orchestra, Russia’s oldest philharmonic orchestra, starting in May 2019.

The Orchestre National de France has made it obvious, while unsaid, that Dutoit’s invitation was an emergence action and few suspect that this is part of a movement to rehabilitate him. The orchestra also noted that the musicians were consulted before the invitation was issued. Dutoit was Music Director of the Orchestre National de France from 1991-2001 with whom he made a number of recordings and toured extensively and Daniele Gatti was music director of the same orchestra from 2008 to 2016. The Orchestre National is part of the Radio France organization and it has an established and often-used complaint program for management issues. Neither conductor has a public record of issues with musicians or staff during their time in Paris.

Orchestras and opera companies are not organizations where management is on the 57th floor and the personnel department is on floor 22. The musicians, staff and managers see each other and mingle every day. The larger issue which has not seriously been explored is the question of how much any management knew of the behavior of Gatti, Dutoit and others, like James Levine at the Metropolitan Opera. Was there a laissez-faire, “boys will be boys” attitude which continually papered over “indiscretions” by top talent? Did management pay attention to the rumors? Were they sensitive to the changing attitude of women toward sexual harassment and abuse? Did they counsel their big name talent about their behavior and how it might impact the institution.

Are there sound programs now in place which will prevent such scandals in the future? Incidents continue to pop up in the press and embarrass major institutions and this does not suggest that the management of sexual harassment issues is universal.

Added note:  In the text above it says “musicians were consulted” about the appearance of Dutoit. The orchestra manager did contact the union representing the musicians of the orchestra and received assurance that there were no objections. Later, an independent poll found that, of the 85 who responded out of a total of 120 orchestra members, some 60% disagreed with the orchestra’s invitation of Dutoit.

Where does the Concertgebouw Stand?

Thursday, February 21st, 2013

by Sedgwick Clark

NOTE: BEGINNING THIS WEEK, I’LL BE POSTING MY BLOG ON THURSDAYS AT NOON RATHER THAN WEDNESDAYS.

Amsterdam’s Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra and its current music director, Mariss Jansons, stopped by Carnegie Hall last week (2/13 and 14) for a pair of concerts to celebrate the ensemble’s 125th anniversary. They were a great success, as always, with everyone on my aisle burbling over its glorious sound and virtuosity.

No doubt whatsoever, it is a great orchestra, and for many of my over-40 years of hearing it in concert it was my favorite European orchestra. But the dark, burnished sonority of yore, cultivated to such full-toned splendor during Bernard Haitink’s tenure (1963-1988), was eviscerated by Riccardo Chailly’s superficial musicianship (1988-2004). And the turnover of orchestral musicians that occurred internationally in the last two decades of the 20th century brought forth a new generation of players who pride clarity over rich, bass-oriented textures. The only orchestra I know that has managed to retain its early-1970s persona resides in Philadelphia, and it remains to be seen what effect its new music director, Yannick Nézet-Séguin, will have.

So what effect has Jansons had on the RCO? While one can’t deny his expertise on the podium, I don’t find much personality in his conducting—of the Austro-German repertoire anyway. He was at his best in the first concert, in his accompaniment to Leonidas Kavakos’s kaleidoscopic brilliance in Bartók’s Violin Concerto No. 2. Still, it was little more than an expert rendering of the score. Listen to soloist Zoltán Székely and the Concertgebouw in the live world premiere recording under Willem Mengelberg in 1939 for those little nudges of temperament I missed with Jansons or the 1958 Stern/Bernstein/New York Philharmonic studio recording (in its judiciously remixed Prince Charles Edition reissue) for no-holds-barred emotional drama.

Recalling Jansons’ devastating Mahler Sixth Symphony a few years ago on LSO LIVE, I looked forward to the Mahler First, which followed intermission. But despite the orchestra’s powerful, pinpoint playing, the Wayfarer themes didn’t sing, the third movement’s Parodie sections were poker-faced, and in general the slow music was impatient and tempo changes were exaggerated. A disappointment.

Little need be said about the next evening’s Strauss Death and Transfiguration and Bruckner Seventh. Over the weekend I pulled out my recordings of Strauss’s own 1926 Staatskapelle Berlin recording, the 1942 Philadelphia and 1952 NBC Toscaninis, 1960 Monteux/San Francisco, and 1983 Haitink/Concertgebouw of the former, and the 1951Furtwängler and 1974 Karajan, both with Berlin, of the latter. All were different, all sublime in their individual ways. Jansons sped up where Strauss marks Sehr breit (“Very broad”) for the transfiguration theme and sailed through the Wagner tuba threnody after the Bruckner’s second-movement climax. Inexplicable.

David Hamilton (1935-2013)

Another of my heroes is gone. David Hamilton, 78, died at home on February 19 after a long illness. He reviewed records and wrote occasional features for High Fidelity when I began building my record collection in college, and I relied on his insights into 20th-century music, especially that of Stravinsky. His initials at the end of a review meant “must read,” even if I had never heard of the composer.

David was a Princeton grad (A.B., 1956; M.F.A., music history, 1960), where he was the music and recording librarian, 1961-65. He was assistant music editor and then music editor at W.W. Norton, 1965-74, then became music critic of the Nation in 1968 and wrote for many publications during his lifetime. I had the pleasure of editing (if that’s the word, for his copy was immaculate) articles of his at Keynote and Musical America. His Metropolitan Opera Encyclopedia (1987) is one of my most frequently used reference books. For many years, he was producer of historical Met Opera broadcasts and wrote notes for the company’s program booklet.

One of the benefits of working in the classical division of Philips and Mercury Records in the early 1970s was that I got to know many writers who were formative in my musical taste. It’s easy to remember my first lunch with David: We were each going to hear Boulez conduct the Philharmonic that evening in what turned out to be one of the great Mahler Sixths I ever heard, and with a grin he pulled out the Mahler Critical Edition score from his briefcase.

We often saw each other at Boulez concerts. The conductor’s Rug Concerts were nearly always sold out, and long lines of the converted would form to get the best seats on the floor. I always arrived early and when the doors opened would storm up the escalator as the ushers shouted, “No running allowed.” (Shades of elementary school!) When David was there, I would save him room. But one night, an all-Schoenberg Rug Concert was only about half full. I remarked after a striking performance of Pierrot Lunaire that it was too bad it hadn’t sold out. “Well, look at it this way,” he replied. “Have you ever seen so many people at a Schoenberg concert?”

David succumbed to Alzheimer’s disease, one of those ironies that we who remain find so baffling in those of such extraordinary intellects. His long-time friend Sheila Porter was with him the afternoon before he died and told me that she and his nurse chose James Levine’s Met recording of Mozart’s Marriage of Figaro for him to hear.

Ring Recycle

Friday, November 18th, 2011

By James Jorden

Now that it has become apparent that Robert Lepage’s production of the Ring at the Met is a fiasco (too soon? Nah.)… well, anyway, since arguably the production is a dreary, unworkable, overpriced mess whose primary (perhaps only) virtue is that it actually hasn’t killed anyone yet, and since, let’s face it, the Machinecentric show turned out to be so mind-bogglingly expensive (all those Sunday tech rehearsals with stagehands being paid, no doubt, in solid platinum ingots!), something has to be done. In this article, I intend to propose that “something.”  (more…)