New Developments in China’s Music Education and Festivals

December 22nd, 2010

by Cathy Barbash

Just back from almost three weeks in China. While I write my reports on recent activity, here is a guest post from Qi Yue, Visiting Scholar at Yale School of Music and Executive Director of the Eastern Strings Music Festival. – CB.


In China, the music-education market is much larger and more promising than the performance market. As urbanization accelerates and huge numbers of middle-class families emerge, more and more parents are sending their children to private violin, piano and ear-training lessons. Kaoji (grade test) and competitions for music students are crowded with children and parents. If you happened to pass by the Central Conservatory of Music in Beijing on a Kaoji date, you would see a long line from inside the campus to the outside sidewalk — not for just an hour, but for several days, until the end of the Kaoji.

This is the case not just in Beijing and Shanghai, but in most major cities in China.

On the other hand, the number of summer music festivals or schools for children can be counted on one hand. Some, funded from sources outside of China, have survived, but are still struggling.

A new one, with non-government backing and outside funding, is emerging. In the summer of 2006, Prof. Wing Ho, from Central Conservatory, started a viola camp, teaching nearly 20 students from all over the country in his apartment in Beijing.  In just over four years, the camp has grown into what is now called the Eastern Strings Music Festival (ESMF), of which I am the executive director. In August 2010, we presented a free outdoor concert by the Jing Bo Lake in Mudanjiang (a northeastern city with a population of nearly three million) to an audience of thousands. Performers ranged in age from four to 65 years old and included nearly 30 faculty members from major conservatories in China, along with 120 students from both the mainland and Taiwan.  The featured soloist was violinist Chen Xi, winner of the Tchaikovsky Competition at the age of 17. Under festival Artistic Director Wing Ho’s baton, the ensemble offered standard western fare as well as local songs specially arranged by a guest Taiwanese composer.

Wing Ho was a visiting professor at Yale School of Music (also his alma mater) for the 2008-2009 academic year and has been asked to serve on the jury for 2011 Primrose Viola Competition. In 2000, he established a string chamber ensemble for 12- to 14-year old students in the Middle School of Central Conservatory. The ensemble, which he continues to conduct, is among the finest in China and serves as an inspiration to string teachers throughout the country.

The mission of ESMF is to bring internationally known music educators to different local Chinese cities, especially those outside of Beijing and Shanghai. As such, it moves to a different city every year.  Since it began, ESMF has traveled from Beijing to Baotou, Xi’an and Mudanjiang.  Students from past years keep coming back, to experience different natural and cultural highlights, following an ancient Chinese saying, “Read ten thousand books and walk ten thousand miles.”

Moving from place to place can be difficult for festival organizers, but the students love this yearly change. [Qi Yue points out that he has taken many music groups on tour throughout Europe, the U.S., and China, including the Golden Sail Symphony Orchestra Europe Tour and New England Conservatory Youth Symphony Orchestra China Tour, so he is well-equipped for ESMF’s format. – CB].

ESMF students range from beginners to advanced; at the end of the eight- to 12-day festival, students perform publicly. ESMF has already performed in such venues as the National Center of  Performing Arts and the Forbidden City Concert Hall. Some of the alumni have been admitted to Juilliard, Central Conservatory and other major international music schools.

In 2011, ESMF plans to launch an international exchange program, as well as introduce new multimedia techniques. Like China, each year the festival is growing and evolving fast.



Layover Thoughts

December 21st, 2010

By Alan Gilbert

Yesterday´s trip from New York to Stockholm turned out fine, I guess, since I eventually arrived, but it would have been easier to take if the problems had resulted from the bad weather that has closed so many of Europe´s airports, rather than from a simple screw-up by the airline. To make a long story short, the airport staff could not locate my reservation, due to the way it had been originally entered. When they finally figured out that I really did have a reservation, the flight had closed, and I couldn´t board. I had to buy a ticket on another airline, for a flight that had a long layover in Amsterdam.

The good thing (other than ending up joining my family at our home just outside Stockholm) was that this gave me time to think about my upcoming Leinsdorf Lecture (on April 4), at which I plan to discuss musical interpretation. On the plane I read a wonderful article by Alan Goldman with the deliberately provocative title of  “The Sun Also Rises: Incompatible Interpretations.” Goldman presents two very cogent, but diametrically opposed, readings of Hemingway´s The Sun Also Rises, and tries to resolve the question of whether they can both be “right.”

This discussion resonated in a meaningful way for me since, for a long time, I have been grappling with my own thoughts about what it means to interpret music, and what makes one  interpretation more compelling than another. I admit that it´s only relatively recently that I´ve been adding a certain rigor to my musings, but I have long held the image in my mind of a piece of music being represented by a mountain, and differing interpretations of the music represented by the different ways one can ascend that mountain. One mountaineer (i.e. musician) might scale the work from the south side, where it is raining, and another might start from its north side, where it is sunny, and both might achieve heights equally close to the summit (that elusive “perfect” interpretation) with completely different points of view.

I´m not sure where I will finally come out on this subject – somehow I like the idea that there is a perfect, best interpretation of a given piece of music, although in practical terms it is essentially meaningless, not least because performances happen in real time, under constantly changing conditions. Furtwängler described a performance as a river: always the same, and yet always different. This seems to me to be a position that is extremely close to an assertion that music does have one “right” course, although one that naturally shifts.

Added complications to the question of musical interpretation include the dimension of technique and execution that is obviously integral to the performance experience, and the expectations and prior knowledge of the audience. A performer must have the technical capacity to realize an interpretation, and this technical capacity finally becomes part of the interpretation, or at least an important aspect of what the audience takes from the performance. Furthermore, audiences may bring their own prejudices, which can either be supported or challenged by a performance – this also becomes part of the relative success or failure of an interpretation.

Hopefully I will come to a point where I will be able to discuss all these threads convincingly. For the moment, I just wanted to share some of my preliminary thoughts with you. I am finding it a fascinating process to read the huge body of work that has been written on the subject by many brilliant philosophers, and will make what headway I can over the next few months.

In the meantime, all best in this holiday season, and see you in the New Year!

(For more information on Alan Gilbert and the New York Philharmonic, visit nyphil.org.)

Christmas with Mark Morris and Alvin Ailey

December 21st, 2010

By Rachel Straus

Nostalgia is the main event in most Nutcrackers.  But in the original 1892 “Nutcracker” by Marius Petipa and Lev Ivanov, the subject—nostalgia for one’s lost childhood—did little for the pre-Freudian audience. The libretto came from the 1816 novella by E. T. A. Hoffman. In it a girl’s favorite Christmas toy (the Nutcracker) comes alive, defeats an evil Mouse King in battle, and whisks her away to a magical kingdom of toys. This plot wasn’t received enthusiastically by Russian audiences (primarily composed of the Tsar’s retinue), who were interested in getting their ballerina divertissements on. And so the child-centric ballet faded from the repertoire.

In the mid 20th century more popular “Nutcracker” productions developed, with the understanding that parents were sending their middle class daughters to ballet class. “Wouldn’t it be nice to see Lauren in a ‘Nutcracker,’ dear?” The rest is history. Most of these “Nutcracker” ballets were made in America, during a time when culture still meant Europe. These versions referenced Victoriana or German volk and its concomitant bourgeois charms. In Act I everyone behaves beautifully. Consequently, the social interactions between the party guests and the perfectly dressed children have always looked stilted. We live in a culture which championed Doctor Spock. That is why Mark Morris’s 1991 version—called “The Hard Nut”—is a brilliant piece of theater. It traffics in social behaviors that we now refer to as the “me” generation. They are as familiar to us as the Big Mac is to many of our mouths.

On December 19 at the Brooklyn Academy of Music, “The Hard Nut” had its last performance of the season. After 19 years in repertoire, it has never looked better. It is pitch perfect in its nostalgic waxing for—and satirizing of—suburbia, the sexual revolution, the Twist and the Hustle. (The Victorian waltz is nowhere to be found.) American nostalgia, Morris brilliantly shows, has little to do with Europe or Russia. Our collective past is memorialized through bell-bottoms, big hair, and the Oprah-esque acknowledgement that all families have “issues”. In the “Hard Nut,” memories of Christmas past include fake trees, the Yule log (blazing on TV), getting useless gifts, drinking spiked eggnog, and warding off lecherous maneuvers of drunken family friends. It also includes a nod to America’s role in slavery through the character of the black Nurse/Maid. Kraig Patterson plays this role brilliantly. Auntie Maim in black pointe shoes? Check.   

Using a truncated version of Tchaikovsky’s score (performed by the 48-member MMDG Music Ensemble under Robert Cole’s baton), the Morris Christmas ballet is a wonder for its visualization of the music. In the beginning of the Act II, the male-female ensemble leaps into the air as the cymbals crash. They are Snow. They sport headgear designed by Martin Pakledinaz that renders them into Dairy Queen soft serve cones. Every one is in a tutu. It’s hard to tell gender. From their hands they throw flakes of powder. As their leaping increases, the snow sprays resemble fireworks bursting in air. It’s delightful.

No prima ballerinas are in “Hard Nut.” The star of the show is the costumes and the set design by cartoonist Charles Burns. In the magic kingdom of Act II, Burns created four gigantic portals, each one slighter smaller than the next, to frame the dance action on stage. The effect is a bit like Hitchcock’s “Vertigo,” especially when a huge bulls eye is lowered on the backdrop and it begins to spin. While Pakledinaz’s costumes are over the top (the Mouse King is Elvis; the Arabian dancers are covered from head to toe according the principles of hijab), Burns’ set is pared down and in black and white. When the giant Christmas tree appears, it moves into the space like a docking Art Deco style ocean liner. Act I may look like 1960s suburbia, but Act II definitely references 1920s glamour, a time in American culture where everything sped up, including the dances.

What is most miraculous about Morris’s “Hard Nut” is how loving it feels. While the choreographer’s recent “Romeo and Juliet” (2007) fell flat (perhaps because Morris’s stayed true to the plot and choreographed male-female dances), in “Hard Nut” he completely dispenses with dancing along gender lines. John Heginbotham dances the role of Mrs. Stahlbaum/the Queen across from Mark Morris who plays “her” husband. The first major pas de deux of the evening happens between two men: William Smith III (Drosselmeyer) and Heginbotham. In the finale, the heterosexual pas de deux between David Levanthal (Nutcracker) and Lauren Grant (Marie) also departs from convention. Other dancers lift them. Not once does Levanthal pick Grant up: ballet;s symbolic act for courtly love. Instead their love for each other is displayed in the last moments in the most obvious way: They kiss and kiss and kiss. Levanthal and Grant are married. From my vantage point, they appeared very happily married.

**

On December 18 at City Center, the Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater held their 21st performance of their annual New York season. The program featured “Love Stories” (2004), “Suite Otis,” (1972), and “Revelations” (1960). The matinee performance began with a historical film in celebration of Ailey’s masterwork, now in its 50th year in repertoire. The show was striking for two reasons. One, the newest crop of company dancers was featured. They include Daniel Harder, Demetia Hopkins, Megan Jakel, Yannick Lebrun, Michael Francis McBride, Samuel Lee Roberts, and Jermaine Terry. All of these dancers joined the company in the past two years. They are technically brilliant. I look forward to seeing them develop in their roles.

The other striking aspect of the show involved watching Vernard J. Gilmore in “Suite Otis” and “Revelations.” Gilmore joined the company in 1997. This year he has come into his own as an expressive, confident, charming, athletic, musical mover. In “Otis,” choreographed by George W. Faison, Gilmore embodied the alternatively loving-fighting suitor with a credibility that made me forget I was watching theater. There is no greater pleasure than seeing a dancer slowly transform from being proficient to being masterful. Gilmore has made the leap in his 13-year tenure with the company. What a lovely gift for the audience.

The tears of a queen

December 17th, 2010

By James Jorden

What makes a dedicated opera queen (well, anyway this dedicated opera queen) sad? Well, it goes like this: the General Manager of the Metropolitan Opera hosts a panel discussion to introduce the company’s upcoming new production of La traviata, the first non-Franco Zeffirelli take on Verdi’s tragedy to be seen there in over two decades.  No tears yet? Bear with me. Read the rest of this entry »

Ozawa Triumphs in Brahms

December 16th, 2010

by Sedgwick Clark

Seiji Ozawa’s fight with esophageal cancer and subsequent attack of sciatica has been increasingly in the news as Carnegie Hall’s JapanNYC festival approached. Artistic director of the festival, Ozawa was scheduled to lead three taxing concerts at Carnegie this week. Earlier this year he canceled nearly all his concerts worldwide, including his final season as music director of the Vienna State Opera, obviously with an eye to keeping his JapanNYC conducting commitments. Ghastly close-up photos accompanying articles in the Times, made the 75-year-old conductor look 20 years older. Then, a week ago, Carnegie announced that, to conserve energy, he would only lead the second half of the first two concerts. Would he make it?

He did. Triumphantly.

I remember the proud Karajan in his final Carnegie concerts in 1989, walking onstage with evident pain and mounting a specially designed podium with a small, built-in seat, invisible to most of the audience, on which he could rest his rump while leading the Vienna Philharmonic. Eugen Jochum sat in his last Carnegie Hall appearance, conducting the Bamberg Symphony in 1983. Whatever physical infirmity these conductors had to endure, it was clear that their intellectual and musical powers hadn’t waned—which is also the current-day case with Levine, Previn, and now Ozawa. I had images of poor old Otto Klemperer in 1970 being carried to the podium for his last concerts, like Karajan and Jochum to lead Bruckner’s Eighth Symphony.

It was thus with great relief at Carnegie on Tuesday that the diminutive Japanese conductor walked onstage, his trademark smile aglow, along with his Saito Kinen Orchestra players. He was just one of the guys, conveniently avoiding a solo bow.

Brahms’s First Symphony was one of Ozawa’s party pieces during his Boston Symphony days—as was Berlioz’s Symphonie fantastique, which he led on the second half of Wednesday night’s Saito Kinen concert. Both were fleet, energetic, young men’s interpretations back then, with the Brahms almost Toscaninian in its propulsive, dramatic drive. But it also seemed a trifle glib in its ease of utterance. On Tuesday night, however, the first movement in particular was broader, more inflected and expressive. Ozawa’s flowing tempo for Brahms’s second movement Andante sostenuto was a welcome change from the funereal pace set by most conductors these days, and the third movement had his usual balletic grace. He had been sitting through much of the performance, but he stood for most of the finale, urging his Saito Kinen players forward in the customary demonstrative Ozawa manner to a rousing coda.

Finally given a chance, the audience leapt to its feet, cheering wildly. Ozawa delayed a solo bow as long as possible, shaking hands with what looked like every member of the orchestra. A jam-packed phalanx of TV cameras in the back of the hall took the proceedings down, and NHK interviewers were out on the street to film spontaneous reactions.

The first half of the concert, conducted by Ozawa protégé Tatsuya Shimono, revealed an orchestra of whiplash precision and recording-studio perfection of balance and intonation in Decathexis, a new work by the young Japanese composer Atsuhiko Gondai. Those of us who enjoy this sort of expertly made orchestral etude, with scores that look like wiring diagrams and roots hailing back to Penderecki, Ligeti, and Xenakis, had fun for 17½ minutes, but the tepid applause indicated that we were in the minority.

More to the majority’s liking was an absolutely splendid Beethoven Third Piano Concerto with Mitsuko Uchida at her heartfelt, lapidary best and an ideal accompaniment led by Shimono.

An exciting evening, no doubt.

Looking forward

No more concerts until the new year!

Untrue West

December 10th, 2010

By James Jorden

Of course it’s insanity in the current financial climate to suggest that the Met should have done a new production of La fanciulla del West this year, even though it’s a very special case: the centennial of the work’s world premiere, which was also the Met’s first world premiere.

In fact, to replace a production of a Puccini opera after only 19 performances would seem foolish even in an era of unbounded prosperity just about anywhere except the Paris Opéra, where the rule is that when a new intendant takes office he is supposed to junk everything this predecessor did, especially the successful stagings.   Read the rest of this entry »

Return of the Reluctant Blogger

December 10th, 2010

by Sedgwick Clark

“It’s been two and a half months since you’ve blogged,” e-wailed Web editor Susan Elliott the other day. “Your numbers have tanked, and soon no one will remember you.  Let someone else walk the dogs, OK?”

“Gotta get those commas right,” I pled.

     Once upon a deadline dreary, while I proofread, weak and weary,
     Over many a quaint and curious typo of forgotten lore—
     While I nodded, nearly napping, suddenly there came a tapping,
     As of someone gently rapping, rapping at my office door.
    “‘Tis some editor,” I muttered, “tapping at my office door—
                                                         Only this and nothing more.”

I never expected to be in deadline hell for so long. But the light shines bright at the end of the tunnel: The 2011 MA Directory is in the mail, and on Monday we honor four distinguished musicians and an Educator of the Year at our annual Musical America Awards ceremony. Susan will have a full report next week. When last I wrote in this space (September 22), I urged you to read the backstage insights of Musical America‘s new blogger, New York Philharmonic Music Director Alan Gilbert. I hope you’ve been enjoying his blogs as much as I have from my self-imposed distance. I’m actually looking forward to blogging again. I intend to mix comments on the new and the notable old, beginning this week with the most recent concert I’ve heard—all-Boulez at the Miller—and continuing with Carnegie Hall’s season openers with the Vienna Philharmonic, which I had begun writing about in early October but had to set aside.

Pierre Boulez’s “Last” 85th-Birthday Celebration
That’s what Ara Guzelimian called it with a laugh as he began his post-intermission interview with Boulez at New York’s jam-packed Miller Theatre on Monday evening. The French composer-conductor (b. March 26, 1925) has been feted internationally for the past year. It must have been a relief for Boulez, in the latest of the Miller’s Composer Portrait series, not to have to lift a finger to hear several of his works performed expertly by a crack group of dedicated young musicians.

The Talea Ensemble, new to me, and conducted by James Baker, performed Dérive 1 (1984) and Dérive 2 (1988/2006); Improvisation I and II sur Mallarmé (1957), sung with seeming effortlessness by Mary Elizabeth Mackenzie. Pianist Anthony Cheung played the 12 Notations (1945), effectively Boulez’s opus 1, although he did not officially dub them so. 

What struck me vividly as I listened was the ease with which these once intimidating works fell on my ears. I’ve heard all of them in concert and on record, except for the most recent—and quite extended—version of Dérive 2, of which this was the U. S. premiere. Most have been conducted by the composer, whose gift in the most complex music has always been to make it sound less fearsome. His stated goal for taking up conducting was to acquaint audiences with the 20th-century classics, which would make it easier to understand new music. My guess is that both conductor and audience had a salutary effect on each other over the years.

I’m not qualified to analyze Boulez’s music—or that of Elliott Carter, who at nearly 102 had come to honor his young friend. I just like to listen to it. So I was pleased to hear Charles Rosen, who recorded Boulez’s First and Third Piano Sonatas in the early 1970s, and is well versed with the idiom, praise the performances when we spoke at intermission. I also found Paul Griffiths’ program notes uncommonly illuminating, especially in his explanation of Boulez’s “ideal of music as ‘a universe in continuous expansion'” and his commitment to compositional “openendedness.” (Too bad that the type was so small and the hall so dark!)

At least four important Boulez CDs were released this year, each with at least one new work in his discography. From Deutsche Grammophon came (1) the final release in his Mahler cycle, which includes the Wunderhorn Songs, with soprano Magdalena Kozená and baritone Christian Gerhaher, and the Adagio from the unfinished Tenth Symphony, (2) Ravel’s two piano concertos and solo Miroirs with pianist Pierre-Laurent Aimard, and, (3) best of all, Boulez’s first recordings of music by Szymanowski, the Violin Concerto No. 1, with Christian Tetzlaff, and the Third Symphony. These artists bring out the expressive best in each other, and the Vienna Philharmonic plays ravishingly. Boulez told me he’d like to record the Second Violin Concerto with Tetzlaff; the Second Symphony and Symphonie concertante, with Aimard, would make ideal discmates. (4) From the Chicago Symphony’s own label, Chicago Resound, came an all-Stravinsky CD of Pulcinella (complete), Four Etudes for Orchestra, and Symphony in Three Movements.

Vienna Philharmonic x 4 Opens Carnegie
This hallowed orchestra opened Carnegie Hall’s new season with a colossal conductorial mismatch: the dithering doyen of the authentic-performance movement, 80-year-old Nicolaus Harnoncourt, and the hottest young maestro on the planet, the volcanic Venezuelan Gustavo Dudamel. So much for my alliterative amusement. The first work in the all-Beethoven opener was the Piano Concerto No. 1. The soloist was Lang Lang, who has perhaps the most beautiful, varied color palette of any pianist before the public today. He just hasn’t always had the taste to go along with it. He underplayed the opening movement of the First until the lengthy cadenza, which he assaulted with Rachmaninoffian thunder. And so it went: power vs. priss. As for the accompaniment, by the end of the very first phrase in the strings—only five seconds—Harnoncourt had weakened the cadence with a diminuendo and taken a prolonged breath before allowing the strings to repeat the phrase a step higher. Fussy to no purpose. I leaned over to my seatmate and whispered, “I’m ready to leave.” Decorum dictated that we remain, but at intermission we fled into the night, skipping the Seventh Symphony. Several friends later told me they wished they had done the same.

For his second concert Harnoncourt led Smetana’s paean to Bohemia, Má Vlast (My Homeland), a folk-nationalist cycle of six symphonic poems of which the second, The Moldau, is a universal favorite. This time, with less fuss from the podium and more vibrato from the Vienna strings, one could revel in much gorgeous playing—such as the ravishing pianissimo strings in the fugato of the fourth piece, From Bohemia’s Fields and Forests. Still, with tighter ensemble the results throughout could have been magical.

The magic was reserved for Dudamel’s concerts. As with his pair of Los Angeles Philharmonic concerts at Lincoln Center last season, interpretive misgivings were soon forgotten. In the first of his concerts, Rossini’s Overture to La gazza ladra was unaccountably rushed and coarse. But Spanish-Cuban-American composer Julián Orbón’s Tres versions sinfónicas (1954) was played with delightfully idiomatic flavor. Go figure. Bernstein’s quarter-hour, eight-movement Divertimento for Orchestra (1980) has moments of his trademark swagger, but it’s a trifle. Dudamel palpably loves it. Two stately dances by Ravel closed the concert. The somber little Pavane pour une infant défunte initially intrigued but ultimately bored. Boléro revelled in superb solo playing, but Dudamel began at such a ppppp that it was several minutes before the snare drum rhythm was clear.

The full-throated Vienna Philharmonic sonority finally emerged the next afternoon. Brahms’s Tragic Overture suffered from the “slow-is-profound” syndrome; give me Toscanini’s whiplash brand of tragedy from 1937. Schumann’s Cello Concerto can be a turgid affair, and I would have preferred sharper orchestral attacks, but Dudamel never covered soloist Yo-Yo Ma, who played at the top of his considerable form. Ma’s duet with the VPO’s first-chair cellist in the middle movement was the high point of the concert if you don’t count his Bach encore. It’s fashionable to denigrate Ma as having sold out or being past his prime. Don’t believe it for a second.

Wary of wearing them out, I consciously avoid such ubiquitous masterpieces as Dvorák’s “New World” Symphony, but I wouldn’t have missed this performance for the [new] world. Those glorious Vienna string players sang out fortissimo, smiling at one other as if let off their leashes at last. Often, as the violins played the top melody, one’s ears perked up as the violas and cellos revealed fresh details, and all contributed lovely touches of portamento throughout. Dudamel’s extreme slowing for the first movement’s third theme may not have pleased everyone, but its excess was emotionally convincing. The second-movement Largo was very slow, with a heart-breaking rendering of the English horn solo. Momentum sagged a bit in the finale, and the coda’s shaping was definitely personal. But what living, breathing, red-blooded music-making, reminiscent of Bernstein and Rostropovich at their peak! Critics who nitpick Dudamel’s performances miss the forest for the trees.

The Classical Letterman
David Letterman usually concludes his show with a rock band. Just as I was finishing this blog, he closed with a classical artist, of all things. The British trumpeter Alison Balsom, whom Harris Goldsmith hailed as a rising young star in the 2008 MA Directory, played a Marcello Allegro from her latest EMI CD, “Italian Concertos.” The audience applauded fervently. So tell me, what ails classical music?

Looking Forward
My week’s scheduled concerts:
12/10 Avery Fisher Hall. New York Philharmonic/Colin Davis; Nikolaj Znaider, violin. Mozart: Symphony No. 36; Elgar: Introduction and Allegro; Violin Concerto.
12/14 Carnegie Hall. JapanNYC Festival. Saito Kinen Orchestra/Tatsuya Shimono and Seiji Ozawa; Mitsuko Uchida, piano. Works by Gondai, Beethoven, and Brahms.
12/15 Metropolitan Opera. Verdi: Don Carlo.

“Black Swan”: A Beastly Ballet Film and Martha Hill: Modern Dance Wrestler

December 7th, 2010

By Rachel Straus

How many ballet clichés can one film hold? Answer: Enough to make you puke. And that is what Natalie Portman spends a fair amount of time doing in “Black Swan,” the pulp ballet movie directed by Darren Aronofsky, which opened December 3. Portman, who plays Nina Sayers, a corps member of a ballet company, isn’t just a bulimic. Like her historic predecessor Victoria Page in the film “Red Shoes” (1948), La Danse makes her bonkers. Ballet, as the old cliché goes, demands a ballerina’s complete subjugation of pleasure. And so the normal desires of a young woman—a love life, some independence and autonomy—are as remote to Nina as a good meal.

In “Black Swan” the protagonist is pain, not this rising dancer Nina. The foil is satire: Nina lives in a pink room among stuffed animals and a tinkling ballerina music box. Whether in the studio or at home she is everyone’s punching bag. Is she an artist? No way. She’s a tool. And when she uses a primitive one to kill herself, she says with a smile “I felt it.” Meaning that she finally understands the dual demands required of the ballerina performing the lead in the late 19th century ballet “Swan Lake:” The White Swan is the virgin and sacrificial lamb; the Black Swan is the whore and murderer (according to Aronofsky). Nina dies with a smile on her face knowing she was both. Now that’s morbidly pathetic.  

Why does Nina dance? Where as Victoria Page (played by Royal Ballet principal Moira Shearer) answers this question in “Red Shoes” with the poise of a peacock—telling her future boss that it’s as necessary as living—no one bothers to ask Nina why she’s willing to endure the mental and physical demands of a highly disciplined life. This lack of character development strikes at the heart of Aronofsky’s problematic ballet flick. The director possesses zero admiration for anyone striving to be an athlete and an artist before they reach their 30th birthday. There is no convincing footage demonstrating how dancers fall in love with the possibility of becoming art. Bone-thin Portman, who is on screen 99 percent of the time, isn’t a dancer. How could she demonstrate the joy and power of dancing? The fact that American Ballet Theatre soloist Sarah Lane is her dancing double doesn’t help. Lane is shot from the calf down or at distance that makes her look like a specter.

Aronofsky got one thing right: Dancers experience pain (subsuming themselves to the aesthetic and physical demands of their art form). But in “Black Swan,” pain is the trope to drive home Aronofsky’s plot in which Nina transforms into a swan—scales and all. Nina’s transformation is gory and sadistic. She mutilates (until she loses finger nails, cracks her bones, and plunges glass into her belly). She is sexually exploited and victimized (in hopes of becoming a more sensual dancer). All the while she goes mad (seeing things and imagining others).

Aronofsky recently told the media that he was surprised that the ballet world didn’t roll out the red carpet, when he announced that he would be making a dance film that would take “Swan Lake” and turn it into a gore fest where female dancers are featured as sex-starved or sex-crazed victims of male power. Perhaps those who were asked to be Aronofsky’s consultants caught his previous film, “The Wrestler” (2008).  In it an aging pro wrestler (Mickey Rourke) is addicted to being pumped, popping pills, and being applauded for getting pulverized. At the end of “Black Swan,” Nina dances “Swan Lake,” whipping her standing leg in perfect circles while her working leg rises up and down on pointe (fuettes). The crowd roars as though she’s Hulk Hogan at a Las Vegas World Wrestling Championship.

Following in the tradition of slasher movies and exploitation films, “Black Swan” is particularly American because it thumbs its nose at high art and its earnest, eccentric, obsessive purveyors. With this in mind, critics reviewed “Black Swan” favorably. Vincent Cassel as the sadistic ballet company chief, Barbara Hershey as the “Mommy Dearest” mother, and Winona Ryler as the aging, raging Ballerina are appropriately monstrous and consequently entertaining. But why New York City Ballet principal dancer and choreographer Benjamin Millepied signed on to play The Prince continues to pain me. My guess is that his decision has something to do with money and a lot to do with Natalie Portman, who is now his girlfriend.

***

Another film that involves dance, but will not get the kind of publicity as the Portman vehicle is Greg Vander Veer’s. At Symphony Space on December 6 in conjunction with Martha Hill Dance Fund, Vander Veer screened an excerpt of his work-in-progress documentary on the dance pioneer Martha Hill (1900-1995).

Hill’s impact on modern dance education in America was equal to Serge Diaghilev’s impact on ballet performance in Europe, writes Janet Mansfield Soares (Wesleyan University Press, 2009). The former Martha Graham dancer created dance departments at New York University, Bennington College, and The Juilliard School. She helped foster dozens of others around the world. She organized the first summer seasons of what is now the American Dance Festival.

In her recent biography of Hill, Soares unearths and reveals Hill’s gargantuan mission to make the nascent modern dance movement as viable as the 400-hundred-year-old ballet tradition. The focus of Vander Veer’s documentary excerpt and Soares’s book is Hill’s battle to bring modern dance (in combination with ballet training) to Lincoln Center, where The Juilliard School was in the process of creating a state-of-the-art, performing arts headquarters.

The problem for Hill and her dance department was the New York City Ballet. Under the executive leadership of Lincoln Kirstein (whose connection to power was that of an oligarch), City Ballet demanded the dance portion of the Juilliard building for its School of American Ballet. At the panel, former Juilliard dance student Risa Steinberg talked about the debacle. Steinberg, now the Associate Director of the Juilliard Dance Division, described how she and fellow students stood outside the State Theater and asked people to sign a petition to keep her school alive. “The voices of all these other people became as loud as Balanchine’s money,” said Steinberg. In the end, the dance division prevailed. But the story is much larger than City Ballet versus Juilliard’s dance department. It’s about the ongoing battle between ballet and modern dance for money, theaters, and audiences. The details are ugly. The personalities are colossal. I hope this film by Greg Vander Veer and his young associates gets made.

 

Stage Right

December 2nd, 2010

By James Jorden

The staging of the Metropolitan Opera’s new production of Don Carlo is a triumph of conservatism. Ironic, when you come to think about it, because that’s the tragic action of the opera too: attempts at reform or even basic human compassion among the court of King Philip II are crushed like so many bugs by the reactionary political arm of the Catholic church.

Now, even for a Regiehead like myself, there is a lot to be said for a well-executed conservative (i.e., noninterventionist) production. Hytner manages to leave Don Carlo strictly in the epoch prescibed in the libretto, and at no time (well, almost) does he directly defy the published stage directions. And yet, the drama is exciting and fresh. So, in this case, conservatism is a (if not the) valid approach to take to a classic.   Read the rest of this entry »

Paris Pelleas Project

November 30th, 2010

By Alan Gilbert

For many years I have been speaking about the idea of introducing a visual element to the auditory core of a concert with Doug Fitch, my friend and frequent collaborator. It’s a tricky matter as it is far from evident how to do so in a way that enhances the experience – by reflecting a true spiritual link between the music and images – and at the same time does not diminish the impact of the music itself.
 
When I ponder this there are several random points that come to mind, which have informed Doug’s and my musings on the subject: 

  • You can’t say that concerts are not already inherently visual: an important part of the experience is observing the ritual of the concert experience itself, from the musicians taking the stage in tails and gowns and tuning, then the concert itself, with the movement of bows and the raising of mallets, including the impressions of the audience around you and the conductor on the podium.
  • Opera is of course visual, and this is true, albeit less so, even when it is performed “in concert.”
  • Some composers purport to think in color: it isn’t just a case of Scriabin’s synesthesia, but the kind of “tone palette” used most obviously by Debussy and the impressionists.
  • Concerts on television present a real challenge: the director’s choices as when to close up and on whom can affect the viewer’s auditory experience as they guide which lines stand out, and add weight and focus in a way usually attributed to the conductor. This means that the listener/viewer is given less choice about what stimuli to respond to. In the concert hall, for example, one might be fascinated by how sensitively a violist is accompanying a famous oboe solo, and decide to concentrate on that level of the music. Seeing a close-up of the oboist’s reed, perhaps with a bead of sweat poised to drip off her nose, would, in this case, be a distraction.
  • Having consciously decided to add an additional visual element, it has to be done with taste and insight – with a real respect for the music itself.

Last Saturday Doug and I were able to act on our theories when I conducted Schoenberg’s Pelleas und Melisande with the Orchestre Philharmonique de Radio France in a performance in which Doug’s images were projected. In fact, it was a series of concerts, because the piece was being done not only in a concert for adults, but also in two youth concerts.
 
We felt that this was an ideal work for us to implement our theories. The piece, although inspired by Maeterlinck’s drama, does not follow a linear narrative. The music captures the emotional spirit – feelings, locations, characters – but it doesn’t follow the story point by point in a literal way. The Rite of Spring would have been a wrong choice because, as a ballet, it was created to convey a storyline with a specific series of visual events. Yes, in the Schoenberg there are moments when clear visual images are suggested, such as the one in which Golaud murders Pelleas, but overall his Pelleas lives in the indefinable areas of psychological exploration and emotional impact.
 
Similarly, in last weekend’s presentation Doug’s images suggested the story without relating it, in a way that was stylish and musically sophisticated – a mis en lumière. For the most part he used black and white images, which seemed inspired by Japanese painting and brushwork, with only the occasional use of color, and the images were projected on a layered series of screens to create a sense of three dimensions. And while the stage lights were down, so people could see the projections of light that conveyed Doug’s visuals, I as the conductor had to be seen by the players, so I was brightly lit, which had the side effect of letting the audience know that the music was still of primary importance. (You can see it online: http://liveweb.arte.tv/fr/part/Orchestre_Philharmonique_de_Radio_France/.)
 
People seemed to like it – afterwards, they spoke of the beauty and commitment of the orchestra’s playing, the elegance and suggestive power of Doug’s images, and, perhaps most importantly for me, the fact that they were able to switch their attention seamlessly back and forth between the elements. This had been the elusive goal we were hoping to achieve in this experimental coupling of aural and visual media. And it wasn’t just the adults at the “normal” concert who appreciated it: the children (roughly aged 9-13) clearly “got it,” even though at first blush Maeterlinck’s story of illicit love, betrayal, and murder would not seem a natural subject for a kids’ concert. When you add to it the fact that this serious, intense 45-minute score is by Schoenberg, the project could seem absurd. But the young audience listened with incredible focus. We did have some explanation and illustrations, including commentary I gave, and perhaps that helped, but the fact is that we didn’t sugarcoat anything, and once the performance began the kids listened with an impressive degree of concentration, and responded warmly when it was over. I found this inspiring, and am eager to try similar projects in New York – for audiences of all ages.

(For more information on Alan Gilbert and the New York Philharmonic, visit nyphil.org.)