\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n Our ensemble has recently had friction with its management over weather-related travel concerns. We had concerts scheduled during both Hurricane Sandy and this most recent blizzard in the Northeast, and as both approached, discussed postponing them with our management company. In both instances, they stated that since plane, train, and public transportation travel had been halted, we would need to rent a van and drive to the engagements. They said that due to the nature of our contracts, we would have to make every effort to get there no matter what. We had serious safety concerns about doing this, due to the predicted severity of the storms. In the end, it turned out in both instances that the presenters chose to reschedule the concerts for hopefully sunnier springtime dates, so we did not need to travel after all.<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n I know that our contracts with presenters include an “Act of God” clause, and my question is, who is empowered to make the decision about whether invoking this clause is the right thing to do? The presenter, our management company, or us? What if all three parties do not agree? Can we refuse to travel if we feel conditions are unsafe? Also, our ensemble is a non-profit organization, with the musicians hired as independent contractors. I am concerned that should we ever go ahead and travel to an engagement during bad weather conditions against our better judgment, and should an accident occur, that the individual musicians would have grounds to sue our non-profit for essentially telling them they must go. Would our management company be held responsible at all since they would not allow us to postpone? Help!<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n An \u201cAct of God\u201d clause is purely a creature of contract. It\u2019s the terms of the contract (not God!) that defines what constitutes an \u201cAct of God\u201d and who gets to make the decision as to whether or not to invoke the clause. If the contract merely says something like: \u201cThis engagement may be canceled in the event of an Act of God\u201d, it\u2019s fairly meaningless. While I am familiar with lots of artists, managers, and presenters who prefer short and simple contracts, the problem with \u201cshort and simple\u201d is that, in cases such as yours, it can also mean \u201cvague and useless.\u201d A good Act of God clause will define what constitutes an Act of God and who can make the determination, as well as address such issues as whether or not deposits need to get returned or engagements re-booked.<\/p>\n In your situation, to determine whether the nature of your contract, in fact, required you to make every effort to get there \u201cno matter what,\u201d I\u2019d need to review your specific contract. However, I can\u2019t image an engagement contract that actually required you to risk personal safely to get to the engagement\u2014especially if planes, trains, and public transportation had all been halted. Even if you had, indeed, signed such a contract, there are always alternatives to risking personal safety merely to comply with a contract\u2014including a legal defense called \u201cimpossibility of performance.\u201d<\/p>\n Regardless of what a contract says or doesn\u2019t say, the ultimate decision to cancel or postpone an engagement, whatever the reason, is always yours. Whether you\u2019re canceling or postponing because you feel you cannot travel safely or canceling because you want to pursue a more enticing offer, those decisions are yours to make, not your manager\u2019s.<\/p>\n Similar to Act of God clauses, manager\/artist relationships are also defined and determined by contracts. However, unlike Act of God clauses, most state laws impose two legal obligations on all agents and managers which can never be waived or altered by contracts: (1) All managers owe a fiduciary duty to their artists (ie: they must put the artist\u2019s interest above their own) and (2) All managers must follow the instructions and directives of their artists. (There are other obligations, too, but these are the most important.)<\/p>\n Like an attorney, a manager is there to provide advice, counsel, and direction, but not to give orders or commands. Unless a manager is also a producer, the manager works for the artist, not the other way around. Final decisions are always yours to make. Of course, the consequences\u2014including being sued by presenter for breach of contract\u2014are solely yours to bear, as well.<\/p>\n Granted, the manager\/artist relationship should always be one of mutual respect, otherwise it doesn\u2019t work for either of you. If a manager feels you are not taking their advice and counsel, and, as a result, you are adversely affecting your career, then the manager may rightly choose to no longer work with you. Likewise, if there comes a point when you believe your manager is putting his or her interest above your own, its time to move on.<\/p>\n As for your liability question, let\u2019s save that for another post. For now, suffice it to say, under our less-than-intuitive legal system, anyone can sue anyone else for just about anything\u2014especially if an artist is injured because you required them to drive in poor weather conditions. Get insurance! Stay tuned.<\/p>\n _________________________________________________________________<\/p>\n For additional information and resources on this and other ![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.musicalamerica.com\/mablogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/07\/GG_logo_for-facebook-150x150.jpg\"){kind=logo}
<\/a>legal and business issues for the performing arts, visit ggartslaw.com<\/a><\/p>\n