<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deep Purple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.musicalamerica.com/mablogs/Index.php?feed=rss2&#038;p=750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.musicalamerica.com/mablogs/?p=750</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 04:48:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.musicalamerica.com/mablogs/?p=750&#038;cpage=1#comment-40807</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.musicalamerica.com/mablogs/?p=750#comment-40807</guid>
		<description>Looks good but why the TV/movie music soundtrack on the promo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good but why the TV/movie music soundtrack on the promo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.musicalamerica.com/mablogs/?p=750&#038;cpage=1#comment-40782</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.musicalamerica.com/mablogs/?p=750#comment-40782</guid>
		<description>What is interesting to me as a designer for theater and opera is the huge split between the audiences for each in embracing the new production styles.  

Theater audiences came much earlier and seemingly with much more understanding to productions that explored subtexts and the cultural origins of the plays they were seeing than opera audiences that have fought long and bitterly against change.  I believe it may be due to opera&#039;s having maintained the repertory system that features a core group of works from Mozart to Strauss that are rotated endlessly, with excursions backwards into the baroque, and forwards to a very few modern composers.  Theater certainly revives its classics (viz. the admired Little Foxes, above), but theater is much more driven by new work and is more likely to interpret older material in the same &quot;everything is on the table and open for exploration&quot; mentality than opera. 

Is the audience&#039;s interest in modern work produced in a modern way beginning to change?  I&#039;ve noticed that a large number of the big hits in New York lately have been Die Soldaten, the MET&#039;s latest Lulu revival along with The Nose and From the House of the Dead, and the Philharmonic&#039;s Grand Macabre.  There are calls for St. Francois d&#039;Assise.  J.J., how do you see it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is interesting to me as a designer for theater and opera is the huge split between the audiences for each in embracing the new production styles.  </p>
<p>Theater audiences came much earlier and seemingly with much more understanding to productions that explored subtexts and the cultural origins of the plays they were seeing than opera audiences that have fought long and bitterly against change.  I believe it may be due to opera&#8217;s having maintained the repertory system that features a core group of works from Mozart to Strauss that are rotated endlessly, with excursions backwards into the baroque, and forwards to a very few modern composers.  Theater certainly revives its classics (viz. the admired Little Foxes, above), but theater is much more driven by new work and is more likely to interpret older material in the same &#8220;everything is on the table and open for exploration&#8221; mentality than opera. </p>
<p>Is the audience&#8217;s interest in modern work produced in a modern way beginning to change?  I&#8217;ve noticed that a large number of the big hits in New York lately have been Die Soldaten, the MET&#8217;s latest Lulu revival along with The Nose and From the House of the Dead, and the Philharmonic&#8217;s Grand Macabre.  There are calls for St. Francois d&#8217;Assise.  J.J., how do you see it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.musicalamerica.com/mablogs/?p=750&#038;cpage=1#comment-40776</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.musicalamerica.com/mablogs/?p=750#comment-40776</guid>
		<description>I saw the play last week.  I thought it was grossly overacted, to the point where some in the audience found it funny.  The characters seemed so exaggerated I lost interest in them.  The result was that the glaring weaknesses of the play were exposed, and it looked more like propaganda for Helmann&#039;s anti-capitalist views.  The strength of the play is the characters as the plot is really quite silly and implausible.  The applause at the end was pretty lukewarm.  If there had been an interval a lot of the audience would have left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the play last week.  I thought it was grossly overacted, to the point where some in the audience found it funny.  The characters seemed so exaggerated I lost interest in them.  The result was that the glaring weaknesses of the play were exposed, and it looked more like propaganda for Helmann&#8217;s anti-capitalist views.  The strength of the play is the characters as the plot is really quite silly and implausible.  The applause at the end was pretty lukewarm.  If there had been an interval a lot of the audience would have left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>